This article was started a month or two ago, fresh from the convention. Sadly I’ve been delayed in updating my blog. Still, for whatever it’s worth, here are my take-away impressions of my first gaming convention.
CanGames occurs in Ottawa, Canada’s capital city. It features all sorts of games: card, board, war and roleplaying.
My goal was to play as many different roleplaying games as possible, to network and to gain some experience on the other side of the Dungeon Master’s screen. My preference is DMing, not being a player. I wanted to learn more about how other people perform that role.
I was a bit nervous at first. My previous experiences with new gaming groups have usually been negative. Either I had a conflicting take on DM styles or I didn’t get along with the other players.
A note on demographics at the RPG tables: predominantly white men in their mid to late 20s up to their 40s. I can only remember seeing a handful of women at all. There was a greater variety (in terms of age, gender and ethnicity) at the board and card game tables, though. No judgment being passed here, just an observation.
Overall my experience was positive. People were very nice and I only had a few negative social experiences (from players, not from DMs or convention staff).
Each session began with an explanation of the “X Card”. People were cool about it, or at the very least, slightly surprised or confused that such an item was needed at all. I was glad that it was there, to be frank, based on crappy experiences in the past (of mine and those of others).
Session One: Dungeon World
This is a game that I’ve GMed several times, but never, ever played. It is one of my favourite games ever, so this was very interesting for me.
A great game session with a very friendly, generous DM by the name of Frank. We had a clever group and players usually fed off of, and built on, each other’s ideas. There was a dull moment toward the middle where I simply couldn’t get a word in due to the number of players (6!) but otherwise it was lots of fun and everyone had a moment to shine.
The DM used special cards to randomly generate encounters, traps and treasures. They were really, really cool and he gifted a stack of them to me (a duplicate copy of the cards that were play-tested during a Kickstarter). I’ll make good use of them, thanks Frank!
My character was a Thief named Mouse. I was reading Mike Mignola’s interpretation of Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser, and so I used that to build up my concept nice and quick. Had a pretty good time.
Biggest takeaways as a player
- I think that this game needs a fun, easygoing GM, someone who wants to see what cool ideas the players come up with. Frank was great and I had a blast.
- It’s really a downer when another player shuts down one of my ideas with straight up negation. To be clear, I’m referring to negation that hinders or halts all progress. It feels demoralizing and boring.
- When I explicitly tell the other players that I feel that the momentum is stalling and that we should try to move things along, it doesn’t work. If anything, it can have the opposite effect (see the previous point).
This is a game that I already own and love, but never played (neither as DM or a player).
It was fantastic and probably the most memorable game session of all. So many intensely difficult choices to make. It wasn’t always apparent which was the best and any tragedies that befell our squadron had heavy dramatic weight.
My character was a “Raven” named Vera from the Ukraine. She was a “Protector” (a trait that was picked for me by the rest of the players based on my in-game actions). She and the “Pigeon” made a hell of a team (I was the Navigator, she the Pilot). We were the most talented and successful of teams but at great cost (to others, mostly). I’d like to think that these two were successful in the war but with many ghosts haunting their dreams.
We had many great, intense moments and it was easy to create connections, drama and camaraderie. Very memorable and powerful game session.
I was sorely tempted to stick with that game the entire convention, but I stuck to my guns.
Biggest takeaways as a player
- Debates about historical or canon facts (ie, nitpicks) ruin the tension and momentum. Such debates need to be outlawed (I remember being tempted to reach for the “X card” because all the pedantic nitpicking). When I next GM a historical game, I’ll make a rule before the session starts that discussions about things that aren’t happening IN the game are to be kept out of it.
- Supporting another player’s choices and coming to their aid even when it doesn’t have any clear benefit to my character had a big pay off. Created bonds between characters and players!
- RPGs are better with really hard choices: especially when something goes really wrong (in a dramatic and cool way). Lesson learned.
My usual game was cancelled on Saturday morning and my new friend Frank (from the Dungeon World game) graciously invited me into his session of Psi*Run.
A fascinating game with a narrow focus but limitless character development options. Fast, frantic and fun (sorry if that sounded like a sales pitch).
I made some blunders during character creation that I still cringe about, but I adjusted quickly and Frank and the other players were forgiving.
This was another game that really stuck with me. I will try to run it when I can.
It began with shared world creation. We ended up with a post-apocalyptic world full of dome cities and a Jetsons-style civilization. My character was Judy Rocketson: a valley girl teen with impossibly huge telekinetically-augmented cybernetic strength. She had an expensive designer purse with a decapitated robot head in it.
Really a blast with a great few scenes of high tension and/or hilarity!
Definitely snagging a copy of this game sometime, somehow.
Biggest takeaways as a player
- I really appreciate group player creation and wish I’d spoken with other players more before settling on my concept. I started off with a neat concept but terrible choices of powers (shouldn’t have been plural!) and questions that were impossible to answer in such a short session.
- I loved shared world building in-game later (tying concepts together as we fed off each other’s ideas). I built on another player’s ideas to build on my own.
- I dislike other players describing my character’s actions or intentions. I don’t know exactly why it bothers me so much, but there you go.
This is an Apocalypse World hack reminiscent of gothic-action-horror games such as Unhallowed Metropolis, Accursed or even Hellboy. The idea is that the PCs are monster-hunters who happen to be monsters themselves. The setting is a pseudo-victorian with a dash of steampunk but mostly occult gothic horror. Very, very cool.
I ended up with an occultist playbook which was really cool. The game isn’t finalized so this was a bit of play-testing. I had some feedback on the nature of the demonic bargains and pacts but I got sidetracked.
The game started off well but one of the players was randomly allocated as the group leader. This can be ok, but it quickly led to disagreements and debate. Well, mostly from me. I didn’t get along with this fellow; I resent being bossed around in-game or out of it (by anyone other than the GM’s NPCs).
I had a solid plan but couldn’t get a word in. The party leader had an idea and didn’t care what the other characters had to say. I found myself strongly resisting the desire to rebel against him, but this would start up shit and make me look like a jerk so I bit my tongue.
Things got bad and I’m not proud of my behaviour. From a combination of too many players, a party split up and some unintentional sulking by me, I got severely bored. I would have left but the convention rules are clear: if you leave before the end of the session you’re banned from the rest of the weekend. So I sat there, silent, rarely able to get a word in.
The session concluded with a decisive battle against a frightening foe. A great scene and conclusion to the story despite the odd player chemistry. This wasn’t a fault of the DM, nor of the rules of the game.
I’m eager to see the completed version of Gothic World and I wish the creator(s) all the best!
Biggest takeaways as a player
- I strongly dislike large groups. It creates waiting periods of inactivity, frequently makes you unable to voice your opinion or to get involved with the action in the heat of the moment. The game had a lot of character and I would have liked to be able to spend more time with it.
- I despise being told what to do by other players, or to be bossed around. I don’t mean other players offering suggestions, but being flat-out told that I should do something specific. Which leads directly into:
- Don’t ever make one player the leader of the others unless they’ve been elected into such a role unanimously by the players.
It was a good experience, but I don’t know if I’ll go back again as a player (unless the GM is from the Ottawa Story Games group). I’m glad to have met some genuinely nice folks and I had a few great gaming moments.
Lastly, I think that I’ll stick with GMing. I’m not a very good player, I’ve come to realize, despite my best intentions!